Consistent Flow, But Some Tense Moments
Kovács maintained firm control, allowing PSG’s high tempo to define much of the first half—only a handful of cautions were needed early on . Midfield clashes were managed well, keeping play smooth and avoiding unnecessary game delays. The early yellow cards set the tone for disciplined tackling.
Red Card Drama
The turning point arrived in the 78th minute. Atlético’s defender, already booked, was sent off for persistent dissent after protesting a decision—a second yellow that proved costly . While some felt referee could’ve been more lenient, Kovács followed protocol on cards for repeated infractions.
VAR Interventions
Several VAR reviews stood out: a disallowed goal for Atlético was upheld after VAR spotted a foul prior to the buildup, and a late penalty for PSG was correctly called for handball by a defender . Although Atlético fans argued the handball wasn’t deliberate and penalties unnecessary, Kovács applied the rules strictly.
⚖️ Balanced or Biased?
Critics argue Kovács showed undue favor toward PSG—particularly in clutch moments like the red card and penalty decision —but others say consistency remained his priority. His decisiveness helped maintain clarity and authority on the pitch.
Referee Verdict:
- Strengths: Effective game control, handled high intensity calmly, clear application of VAR.
- Weaknesses: Perhaps lacked empathy impacting Atletico; his decisions on dissent and penalty were called into question.
Overall, Kovács kept the match flowing and adhered closely to regulations. But with Atlético reduced to ten men and facing a game-changing call late in the match, debates about fairness and margin of officiating error are sure to linger—even after PSG’s emphatic win.
